Figure 8 shows the areas in New England that are presently designated “non-attainment” for the one-hour ozone standard of 0.12 parts per million (ppm). Non-attainment areas for the one-hour ozone standard were classified as marginal, moderate, serious, severe, or extreme depending upon the severity of the air quality problem at the time of the Clean Air Act of 1990 passage. We can see that ground-level ozone presents a serious air quality problem in southern New England. The historically exceedances of 8-hour ozone standard in southern New England state: Connecticut, Massachusetts, and Rhode Island are presented in Figure 9.
Please note that the number of exceedances in a given year is very related to the number of days with elevated temperatures that year. The total number of ozone exceedance days in New England versus high temperature days (i.e., those with maximum temperatures greater than 90°F) for the years 1980 to 2000 (Figure 10).
In addition to the high temperature, ground-level ozone is also affected by other natural factors (e.g., sunshine, wind, and humidity) and human factors (land-use and land cover). Since the natural factors are largely beyond our control, the emission control of VOCs and NOx from human activities has been the major focus in the ground-level ozone reduction programs. Reducing gasoline and diesel engine use (NOx), plus curtailing activities involving VOCs, are common means to “shave the peaks” of ozone buildup and avoid exceeding the federal and state health-based standards for tropospheric ozone.
Land-use and land cover change, especially the urban sprawl, has been proven to play an important role in forming and distribution of ground-level ozone. Figure 11 shows the spatial variation of ground-level ozone in Connecticut and Rhode Island. The exceedance days for 1-hour ozone standard varied greatly in southeast New England. For example, East Hartford, CT only has 76 days exceeding the EPA standard from 1992 to 2000, while Stratford experienced over 200 days during the same time period.
The relationship between ground-level ozone and land cover types as well as land cover change was examined using multitemporal Landsat Thematic Mapper (TM) data. Ozone measurements from thirteen ozone monitoring stations in Connecticut and Rohde Island were used for the analysis. The monitoring stations were classified into different categories based on their locations and land cover characteristics (Figure 12). Comparisons of ozone concentrations and exceedances were made between land cover types and related to the dynamics of the land cover change. The results showed that ground-level ozone in southern New England region varied with land cover types and affected by land cover change. Strong correlation between ozone concentrations with land cover change indicates that the ozone problem is linked to overall environmental management and planning.